Euthyphro, By Plato The Main Idea That Comes Up Is...

Seiji Hayashi PHIL 3500 Chrisoula Andreou In Euthyphro, by Plato the main idea that comes up is socratic ignorance. Euthyphro argues that he is the self proclaimed expert on the subject of piety and impiety. I could argue in the position that, Euthyphro is claiming expertise in a subject that he doesn t know enough about. This socratic ignorance is the idea of the dialogue. I have decided to take an extra argument in this paper. I argue there is ignorance in both Socrates and Euthyphro. Although it s more difficult to prove, I explain the situations of piety and impiety and how it is relative to each person and the time period of the discussion. Bringing the background situation to show claims made by Euthyphro and lack of evidence provided in this dialogue. The supporting claims I share after are on Euthyphro’s side of conversation. This determines his thoughts, on the definition of piety and unspoken details that I have determined. Socrates also makes arguments that are known to be true, to Euthyph ro through comparison of different circumstances. This happens through Socrates and Euthyphro, use of asking questions and questing answer, from what explained, based on the knowledge of Euthyphro. I use the background of the whole dialogue, in pointing out flaws in the responses of both parties. I also bring into aspect of the circumstance relative to the time period, and the nature of people s beliefs, in religion. The background of the dialogue the important to theShow MoreRelatedThe Republic And The Socratic Dialogue1769 Words   |  8 Pagesand the Socratic dialogue Euthyphro we can conclude that there are a lot similarities and differences in the arguments between Socrates and Thrasymachus and Socrates and Euthyphro. Both pieces and arguments have similar tones and shows how Plato, through Socrates, would get to the bottom of certain issues. Upon entering the house In Plato’s The Republic, Socrates didn’t know what he was walking into when the discussion of justice was brought up. The main question that had been brought up was whatRead MoreSocrates and Properties Essay3228 Words   |  13 Pagesignorant and wise, he presents us with one of the most striking paradoxes. Like so many of the other philosophers, is provocative in that its apparent self-contradiction hides an important idea for us readers to discover. Though out this text Socrates ignorance results from his belief that he has no knowledge of moral idea, or moral properties, such as justice, virtue, piety, and beauty. He asserts that, if only he knew the relevant definitions, he would be a moral expert who could answer philosophicalRead MoreThe Trial of Socrates: an Analysis and Construction of Socrates Defense2369 Words   |  10 Pagesphilosophical advancements. Athens could very well be divided, morally on various aspects, one of them being which â€Å"political† affiliation Athenians related themselves with. Some choices were between the Traditionalists, Sophists or an up and coming ideas of Socratics or Platonics. Militarily, during the life of Socrates, Athens was involved in the Peloponnesian Wars, a set of conflicts between Sparta and Athens, in which Athens ultimately loses. Historically, this time became known as the rule ofRead MoreHow Wisdom Has Impacted My Education And My Ultimate Relationship With It2482 Words   |  10 Pagesrelationship with it. There are five units that we have addressed in the course. The first in regards to wisdom and Socratic ignorance. One of the passages is from the Five Dialogues text and focuses on the written accounts of the great Greek philosopher Socrates in his search for ultimate wisdom. His life stories are predominately documented by his students Plato and Xenophon. Plato is one of his most renowned students and would go on to teach Aristotle. Socrates was born in Athens, Greece and inRead MoreSocratic Ethics Essay2636 Words   |  11 Pagesspecifically in the readings, Euthyphro, the Apology, the Crito and the Phaedo. Socrates’ main question was â€Å"What is the good life?† and his pursuit was to find out how to live this â€Å"good life†. Socrates’ pursuit of the â€Å"good life† helped him to identify knowledge with virtue. He equated knowledge with good or virtue and ignorance with bad or evil. Since no one would knowingly harm themselves, if harm came to a person, then that person must have acted in ignorance. This led him to the thought